5 Ways Universalism Challenges Cultural Relativism

Quick Links :

The debate between universalism and cultural relativism has been ongoing for centuries, with both sides presenting compelling arguments. Universalism posits that there are certain absolute truths and principles that apply to all humans, regardless of their cultural background. On the other hand, cultural relativism argues that truth and morality are relative to the cultural context and that what is considered right or wrong varies across cultures.

In this article, we will explore five ways in which universalism challenges cultural relativism, highlighting the tensions and complexities between these two philosophical perspectives.

1. The Problem of Moral Absolutism

One of the primary challenges that universalism poses to cultural relativism is the problem of moral absolutism. Universalists argue that certain actions, such as murder, torture, and genocide, are absolutely wrong and cannot be justified under any circumstances. This presents a challenge to cultural relativism, which argues that moral judgments are relative to the cultural context.

For instance, some cultures may practice female genital mutilation (FGM) as a rite of passage, while others may view it as a form of torture. A cultural relativist might argue that FGM is acceptable in cultures where it is practiced, while a universalist would argue that it is absolutely wrong, regardless of the cultural context.

The Case for Moral Absolutism

Universalists argue that moral absolutism is necessary to protect human rights and prevent atrocities. Without a set of absolute moral principles, cultures may justify heinous acts as acceptable, leading to widespread human suffering. Moreover, moral absolutism provides a foundation for international human rights law, which is essential for promoting justice and dignity across cultures.

2. The Challenge of Human Rights

The concept of human rights is another area where universalism challenges cultural relativism. Universalists argue that human rights are inherent and inalienable, while cultural relativists argue that human rights are relative to the cultural context.

For example, some cultures may not recognize the right to free speech or freedom of assembly, while others may view these rights as fundamental. A cultural relativist might argue that human rights are not universal, but rather are shaped by cultural norms and values.

The Universality of Human Rights

Universalists argue that human rights are universal and apply to all humans, regardless of their cultural background. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is a prime example of this, as it sets out a framework for human rights that is applicable to all cultures. Moreover, human rights are essential for promoting dignity, justice, and equality across cultures.

3. The Role of Reason and Rationality

Universalism also challenges cultural relativism by emphasizing the role of reason and rationality in shaping moral judgments. Universalists argue that moral judgments should be based on reason and evidence, rather than cultural norms and traditions.

For instance, some cultures may practice witchcraft or sorcery, while others may view these practices as superstitious and irrational. A cultural relativist might argue that these practices are acceptable in cultures where they are practiced, while a universalist would argue that they are irrational and should be rejected.

The Importance of Reason and Rationality

Universalists argue that reason and rationality are essential for promoting moral progress and preventing harm. Without a commitment to reason and evidence, cultures may justify harmful practices as acceptable, leading to widespread suffering. Moreover, reason and rationality provide a foundation for critical thinking and moral reflection, which are essential for promoting moral growth and development.

4. The Challenge of Cultural Imperialism

Cultural relativism is often criticized for failing to address the issue of cultural imperialism. Universalists argue that cultural relativism can be used to justify cultural imperialism, where dominant cultures impose their values and norms on weaker cultures.

For example, some cultures may practice colonialism or imperialism, while others may view these practices as unacceptable. A cultural relativist might argue that colonialism is acceptable in cultures where it is practiced, while a universalist would argue that it is absolutely wrong, regardless of the cultural context.

The Universality of Cultural Imperialism

Universalists argue that cultural imperialism is a universal problem that requires a universal solution. Cultural imperialism is a form of oppression that can be justified in no cultural context. Moreover, cultural imperialism undermines the very principles of cultural relativism, as it seeks to impose dominant cultural norms and values on weaker cultures.

5. The Role of Emotions and Empathy

Finally, universalism challenges cultural relativism by emphasizing the role of emotions and empathy in shaping moral judgments. Universalists argue that emotions and empathy are essential for promoting moral growth and development, as they allow us to connect with others and understand their experiences.

For instance, some cultures may practice empathy and compassion, while others may view these practices as weak or unacceptable. A cultural relativist might argue that empathy is acceptable in cultures where it is practiced, while a universalist would argue that empathy is a universal human emotion that should be cultivated in all cultures.

The Importance of Emotions and Empathy

Universalists argue that emotions and empathy are essential for promoting moral progress and preventing harm. Without a commitment to emotions and empathy, cultures may justify harmful practices as acceptable, leading to widespread suffering. Moreover, emotions and empathy provide a foundation for moral reflection and growth, which are essential for promoting human flourishing.

Gallery of Universalism and Cultural Relativism

In conclusion, universalism poses a significant challenge to cultural relativism, highlighting the tensions and complexities between these two philosophical perspectives. By emphasizing the importance of moral absolutism, human rights, reason and rationality, cultural imperialism, and emotions and empathy, universalism provides a framework for promoting moral progress and preventing harm.